As a result, it's a pretty bad library based music player in Windows (although nowhere close to as bad as people make it out to be). The Windows version is slower, buggier and less responsive. ITunes for Mac is a great music player/jukebox. * Watch folders, which, if it wasn't ugly, would be reason enough to use it. In iTunes, if you start playing a Beatles song, then search for "The Clash", if that Beatles song ends, it will not go to the next Beatles song, because the original song is no longer visible. * When the track changes, if you have searched for something, it doesn't just stop like iTunes. This is one of the most annoying features in iTunes. * When the track changes, this list doesn't snap back to the new song. * For some reason there is a prominent button to show the "About" dialog. iTunes calls the manner of sorting that I suggest "album by artist". I'm not sure what secondary ordering its actually using - it's not alphabetical by track or ordered by track number (all 1, all 2. * Sorting by artist seems to be broken - if I sort by artist, it should logically order each artist's albums alphabetically as well. Is this really something that people care about? * The largest UI element is the number of seconds that have elapsed in the current song. I guess they would have to spend some time drawing a completely custom button. * No fullscreen on Lion - this takes, literally, 5 minutes to add.
WINAMP FOR MAC REVIEW HOW TO
* I couldn't figure out how to hide "Genre", which I strongly dislike, and "Year", which I don't care about. It has the exact same elements in the exact same places, except Winamp looks like a tacky GTK+ theme. * Visuals aside, the UI is basically iTunes. As far as I can tell, it's mostly just an ugly version of iTunes.